|
 |
 |

 |

Individualized Learning Model
|
|
|
Dairy Council of California has long put a premium on developing
our education programs based on solid education research. Thirty years ago, DCC
programs were developed based on the teachings of the well known educator, Madeline
Hunter from the UCLA's University Elementary School. These theories evolved from
focusing on information and skills in the 1970s to a behavior change focus in the
1980s and 1990s. DCC acknowledges that due to environmental and technological changes,
today's learner is different than that of 10 - 20 years ago, and in the late 1990s
we set out to update our educational model to better match the needs of today's
learner.
|
|
|
After attending numerous conferences, conducting an intensive review
of the education and neuroscience/learning literature and interviewing experts in
the field, DCC developed the following Individualized Learning Model to guide our
current program development. Our objective was to develop a model that integrates
current educational theory to promote critical thinking of the learner leading to
improved health habits. Our newest programs based on this model are more learner-centered
and accommodate more individualized instruction. In some instances, individualization
is achieved by a greater reliance on technology.
This individualized learning model integrates multiple factors that
support learning and personal decision making, including developmental and motivational
considerations. Acquisition of knowledge alone is not our endpoint, nor is a positive
change in attitude. Rather, achieving and sustaining positive behavior change is
the desired outcome of our programs.
|
 |
Step 1 - Develop Personal Meaning
At the beginning
of a successful instructional experience the learner establishes a positive emotional
connection and links with past, real-life experiences.
A positive emotional connection helps the learner begin to feel comfortable with
the thought of making a change. In this stage it is especially important to connect
to the individual's emotions since it will engage the learner and motivate change.
The personal relevance increases the likelihood the learner will retain the information
and act on it in the future.
In a health lesson or counseling session, linking with past experiences
is easily achieved by beginning with a self- assessment of personal health habits.
Through this the individual may recognize the existence of a problem. The learner
may be in the pre-contemplative stage (defined in Prochaska's Stages to Change/Readiness
to Learn Model); they are deciding if they truly want to make a behavior change.
The learner is being led by the facilitator or teacher toward the
next step of conceptualizing a potential change. They are instructed to imagine
decreasing the barriers around improving health habits. Emphasis is put on increasing
confidence in the individual's ability to successfully make a change. For more ideas
on instructional strategies appropriate for this step,
click here.
|
|
|
 |
 |
Step 2 - Conceptualize the Problem
Here the individual acquires the necessary knowledge to begin
creating a plan for change. The major focus is on content: setting the learner up
to process the information, helping them define the choices they would like to make
and developing a plan for improvement.
Learners are most successful when they are led to consider multiple
options for improving their health behavior and then selecting their best choice.
By the individual identifying their own best choices the likelihood of behavior
change is increased. The individual is supported best when they perceive they are
truly empowered to make a choice to resolve the problem. For more ideas on instructional
strategies appropriate for this step, click
here.
|
|
|
 |
 |
Step 3 - Personalize a Plan
Once the best choices have been made, the plan for change is created
and the plan has been individualized and tailored to the individual's own specific
needs, it is the time to practice the plan and adapt it for personal usefulness.
The learner now prioritizes the information to allow them to take action and apply
it to real-life situations. The learner determines the unique barriers that could
undermine the plan and does decision-making and problem solving to visualize possible
solutions. The learner is directed toward small changes that are more likely to
be sustained over time than large, sweeping changes.
At this point, the individual has identified areas for change, developed
their plan, and moved to action. Now is the time for self-reflection and re-adjustment
of the plan. For more ideas on instructional strategies appropriate for this step,
click here.
|
 |
Step 4 - Maintain the Plan: Integrate into Lifestyle
This phase of the learning model will happen after the instruction
has been completed. Here the individual has created personal adaptations for integrating
the plan into his/her daily habits. At this point, they continue to make
adjustments and gain new insights to barriers that come up. Because the learner
has internalized a value for the new health behavior, the choices have now become
a lifestyle change. An important aspect of this phase, however, is managing variances
and setbacks. "Ebb and flow" occur as the individual may slip back into old habits.
They will need to make adjustments to get back on track with the plan. Social and
environmental support is critical here. For more ideas on instructional strategies
appropriate for this step, click here.
How this model is applied varies depending on the age of the learner.
Programs for younger children focus on the basic skills of health education. The
role of the teacher focuses on developing personal meaning for healthful behavior
and providing the conceptual background on nutrition, activity and lifestyles choices.
Programs for older children, adolescents and adults focus on specific health related
issues and the instructional process emphasizes personalizing the plan and maintaining
the plan. The teacher/facilitator's role becomes less instructional and more supportive
or passive and the learner takes charge.
Program evaluation efforts completed to date demonstrate that this
model contributes to healthier choices. To review DCC's program evaluation summaries
for schools click here and for health care
settings click here.
|
|
|
 |
 |
References
Diamond, Marian and Janet Hopson. Magic Trees of the
Mind, New York: Dutton/Plume, 1999.
Goleman, David. Emotional Intelligence, New York: Bantam, 1997.
Hunter, Madeline. Teach to Transfer, Los Angeles: Hunter Enterprises Inc,
1971.
Piper, John and Sylvia. 4 - MAT Assessment Model, 1998.
Prochaska, James. Changing for Good, Pennsylvania: Avon Books, 1995.
Rosenstock, IM: Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs
2:328-335, 1974.
Rosenstock, IM, VJ Strecher, MH Becker: Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief
Model. Health Education Quarterly 15(2): 175-183, 1988.
Wiggins, Grant. Understanding by Design, Virginia: Assn for Supervision and
Curriculum Development, 1998.
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|